Roderic Wye
Associate Fellow, Asia Programme
Though Beijing favours Remain and sees some benefits in the UK’s membership, a Leave vote is unlikely to lead to an exodus of Chinese investment and interest in Britain.
The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Chinese President Xi Jinping attend a ‘Creative Collaborations: UK & China’ event at Lancaster House on 21 October 2015 in London. Photo by Getty Images.
China’s leadership has outwardly backed the Remain option in the UK’s referendum on EU membership, with President Xi Jinping declaring during his state visit to the UK last year that ‘China hopes to see a prosperous Europe and a united EU, and hopes Britain, as an important member of the EU, can play an even more positive and constructive role in promoting the deepening development of China-EU ties’. But perhaps things are not quite that straightforward. While there are good reasons to take Xi’s words at face value, it is also possible to argue that China’s interests might not be that adversely affected by Brexit.
China is generally reluctant to encourage the break-up of established orders and is uncomfortable with the uncertainty that such actions can generate. Somewhere in the background is China’s own sensitivity that a Brexit might be used as a model for a potential break up of China, or might encourage Taiwan, and even Hong Kong, to go their own way. Brexit, especially if it were to lead to further referendums on the constitution of the United Kingdom, would be a worrying phenomenon for Beijing.
Until recently China saw the European Union as a potential foil against the US on the global stage, but as China becomes more assertive in its region it has, perhaps, less overall interest in Europe acting as a single geopolitical entity. It is much more comfortable with the status quo, where the EU continues to struggle to forge an effective common foreign and security policy and where member states are often prepared to pursue their own relations with China. Brexit would benefit such a policy.
On trade, however, China has undoubtedly benefitted from the presence of the UK within the EU and would miss the UK’s voice in the European Council and at EU−China summits. While it does not see the United Kingdom as the most influential voice shaping European policy – that remains Germany – the UK has consistently taken a liberal approach which has been largely beneficial to Chinese interests. The UK has also initiated or led the way in a number of areas that have been of direct benefit to China. For example, the UK was the first European country to apply for membership of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, a move which was quickly followed by other member states. In the absence of the UK, liberal voices within the EU would find it harder to resist the more protectionist attitudes of some member states. This is probably the essence of the ‘positive and constructive role’ played by the UK that China would like to see preserved.
Britain has become the number one destination for Chinese foreign direct investment in Europe and maintaining and increasing Chinese investment is likely to remain a high priority for any post-Brexit British government. It is not so clear, however, how Chinese investors would react. The loss of automatic access to EU markets and potential tariff problems would be a drawback and there is a fairly widespread view among much of the business community that China would be wary of future investment in Britain under such circumstances. Leading Chinese businessmen with substantial investments in the UK such as Wang Jianlin of Dalian Wanda have said as much, while others have spoken of the widespread feeling in Beijing that UK withdrawal would not be a good thing.
At the same time, Chinese businesses in the UK would be forced to consider whether they should relocate and face the problem of moving to potentially less friendly investment environments should they decide to do so. A big part of the UK’s attraction to Chinese investors might remain intact and companies like Huawei operating in sensitive areas may prefer to remain where they know they are welcome.
Leaving the EU might allow the UK more room to launch new strategic initiatives with China. Wang Hongzhang, chairman of the China Construction Bank, has said that ‘whether the UK will stay in the EU or not will not do any harm to trade and economic ties or financial relations between the UK and China’. While this is possibly true from a policy perspective, it is less certain from an economic one. There are particular areas of interest to China, such as investment in property and the financial services sector, where Brexit would be unlikely to harm China’s interests directly. Chinese interest in UK property remains high, and a post-Brexit British government would probably work hard to continue to attract Chinese business to the City of London. This could be helpful to China’s desire to internationalize the renminbi, for example. Education is another area where the UK would be keen to continue to attract overseas students, of whom Chinese make up a significant proportion, particularly if many EU students were put off by the prospect of rising fees.
While a post-Brexit Britain would be free to negotiate its own trade and investment regime with China, the Chinese would probably conduct such negotiations with more than half an eye on their wider and more important discussions with the EU. The UK is still a substantial economy, but, as with President Obama, Britain might become less of a priority for China than it was before. This is especially likely to be true in areas such as investment in manufacturing where China would wish to export a significant amount of any product produced in the UK to the EU’s single market.
On balance, the loss of Britain’s voice in the EU in a Leave vote could be a net loss for China, but it would retain considerable options. In a post-Brexit world, the UK would be trying harder to penetrate Chinese markets and to attract Chinese investment but the argument would be harder to make to a sceptical Chinese audience and less clear on what would be the competitive advantage to them of locating in the UK. Whatever happens, China will continue to have a strong economic stake in the UK, and it is not going to dump that overnight.
虽然北京的青睐仍然存在,并看到一些好处,在英国的成员,离开投票是不太可能导致大量的中国投资和兴趣在英国。
The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Chinese President Xi Jinping attend a 'Creative Collaborations: UK & China' event at Lancaster House on 21 October 2015 in London. Photo by Getty Images.
中国的领导层已经向外支持仍然选择在英国加入欧盟的公投,习近平总统宣布在他访问英国去年,中国希望看到一个繁荣的欧洲和美国EU,并希望英国作为欧盟的重要成员,可以发挥更积极建设性的作用,推动中国与欧盟关系的深化发展。但也许事情不是那么简单。虽然有很好的理由以面值的西的话,也可以说,中国的利益不可能通过英国退欧不利影响。
中国一般不愿意鼓励建立订单分手,与这种行为产生的不确定。处在背景的是中国自身的敏感性,英国退欧可能作为一个潜在的打破了中国模式,或可能鼓励台湾、甚至香港,走自己的路。英国退欧,尤其是如果它是导致进一步的公投对英国宪法,对于北京来说是一个令人担忧的现象。
直到最近,中国看到欧盟作为陪衬的潜力在全球舞台上反对美国,但中国在该地区变得更加自信了,也许,那么整体利益在欧洲作为一个单一的地缘政治实体。它与现状更舒适,在欧盟继续努力打造一个有效的共同外交与安全政策,成员国往往愿意追求自己与中国的关系。英国退欧将受益这一政策。
英国已经成为了欧洲和维护中国对外直接投资的首选之地,越来越多的中国投资可能会有英国退欧后英国政府仍然是一个高优先级。然而,中国投资者如何反应还不太清楚。自动进入欧盟市场和潜在的关税问题的损失将是一个缺点,有很多,在这样的情况下,中国要警惕未来的投资在英国企业界比较普遍的看法。在英国有大量投资的中国商界人士,如万达()的万达(王健林),也曾这么说过,而另一些人则谈到了在北京普遍存在的一种感觉,即“退出”并不是一件好事。
与此同时,在英国的中国企业将不得不考虑他们是否应该重新安置,并面临这样的问题,如果他们决定这样做,他们将转向不太友好的投资环境。英国对中国投资者的吸引力很大一部分可能保持不变,像华为这样在敏感领域经营的公司可能更愿意留在他们所知道的受欢迎的地方。
离开欧盟可能会让英国更大的空间与中国展开新的战略举措。王红章,中国建设银行的董事长,说:“英国是否会留在欧盟或将不会做任何损害英国与中国的贸易和经济关系或经济关系。从政策的角度来看,这可能是正确的,但从经济的角度来看,这是不太确定的。有感兴趣的特定领域的中国,如投资房地产和金融服务业,在英国退欧不会损害中国的利益直接。中国在英国物业的兴趣仍然很高,和后英国退欧英国政府可能会努力工作,继续吸引中国企业到伦敦市。这将有助于中国希望人民币国际化,例如。教育是另一个地区,英国将热衷于继续吸引海外学生,其中中国占了很大比例,特别是如果许多欧盟学生被推迟的前景,收费上升。
在后英国退欧英国将自由谈判自己的贸易和中国的投资制度,中国可能会进行超过一半关注自己的更广泛和更重要的讨论与欧盟谈判。英国仍然是一个实质性的经济,但是,正如奥巴马总统,英国可能在中国成为一个较低的优先级比以前。这是可能是真的在诸如制造业的投资,中国希望在英国生产出口到欧盟的单一市场的任何产品,大量。
平衡,在离开投票在欧盟英国的声音损失可能是中国的净损失,但会保留相当大的选项。在后英国退欧世界,英国将努力打入中国市场,吸引中国投资,但争论很难使持怀疑态度的中国观众少会有什么竞争优势,他们在英国定位清晰。无论如何,中国将继续在英国有强大的经济利益,它不会倾倒,一夜之间。